<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use Web Analytics to determine the width of your Internal Search Query box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-width-of.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-width-of.html</link>
	<description>Increasing Front Page Performance for Online Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:54:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VisualRevenue &#124; Using a Page Revenue Participation metric for Conversion Optimization</title>
		<link>http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-width-of.html#comment-50257</link>
		<dc:creator>VisualRevenue &#124; Using a Page Revenue Participation metric for Conversion Optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-the-width-of-your-internal-search-query-box.html#comment-50257</guid>
		<description>[...] about revenue participation per say and if you are still listening, the post about how you can Use Web Analytics to determine the width of your Internal Search Query box might be worth a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about revenue participation per say and if you are still listening, the post about how you can Use Web Analytics to determine the width of your Internal Search Query box might be worth a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VisualRevenue &#124; Measuring dynamic internal search performance</title>
		<link>http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-width-of.html#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>VisualRevenue &#124; Measuring dynamic internal search performance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-the-width-of-your-internal-search-query-box.html#comment-461</guid>
		<description>[...] - by Dennis R. Mortensen. Tuesday, May 22, 2007   As a follow-up to my previous post on how to use Web Analytics to determine the width of your Internal Search Query box – I thought it would be suitable for me to deploy an internal search utility on my blog. Looking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; by Dennis R. Mortensen. Tuesday, May 22, 2007   As a follow-up to my previous post on how to use Web Analytics to determine the width of your Internal Search Query box – I thought it would be suitable for me to deploy an internal search utility on my blog. Looking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VisualRevenue &#124; Search-dominant visitors vs. Navigation-dominant visitors. (+ how to segment)</title>
		<link>http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-width-of.html#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>VisualRevenue &#124; Search-dominant visitors vs. Navigation-dominant visitors. (+ how to segment)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-the-width-of-your-internal-search-query-box.html#comment-446</guid>
		<description>[...] somewhat recently wrote an article on how to determine the width of an internal search box. However; this post do not debate whether you should have an internal search tool to begin with and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] somewhat recently wrote an article on how to determine the width of an internal search box. However; this post do not debate whether you should have an internal search tool to begin with and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis R. Mortensen</title>
		<link>http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-width-of.html#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis R. Mortensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-the-width-of-your-internal-search-query-box.html#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott (Sorry about the Ben thing.. I noticed it right after, but there is no possibility to changed that in blogger, as far as I know) :-)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In regards to your first question:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&gt;&gt; for the calculation of the percent all search queries are you simply taking the total count for each length and dividing by the grand total of all searches (e.g. search of 5 characters with count of 1000 divided by total of 5000 = 20% of all searches had 5 characters) and expressed as percentage?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Not entirely. If you have a look at the graph under section 5a; the calculation is done as a total of ALL search queries that can be accommodated in an Internal Search Query Box of a 5 character width. Therefore a calculation as this:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Length 1 (    13 searches) = 13 / 24000 total searches = 0.1%&lt;br/&gt;Length 2 (    45 searches) = 45+13 / 24000 total searches = 0.2%&lt;br/&gt;Length 3 (  251 searches) = 13+45+251 / 24000 total searches = 1.3%&lt;br/&gt;Length 4 (  528 searches) = 13+45+251+528 / 24000 total searches = 3.5%&lt;br/&gt;Length 5 (  866 searches) = 13+45+251+528+866 / 24000 total searches = 7.0%&lt;br/&gt;Length 6 (3471 searches) = 13+45+251+528+866+3471 / 24000 total searches = 21.4%&lt;br/&gt;etc..&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(N.B. the total number of searches was 24000 something, I cannot remember the total, but it will match up)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In regards to the second question:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&gt;&gt;  Could a similar methodology be applied to external search keywords to determine perhaps the best keyword phrase lengths to optimize for with SEO/SEM?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I cannot see a correlation too that. However; one could start using “similar” attitudes towards calculation of optimal “html title length” and other high value SEO factors for organic traffic to your specific site and keywords. But that is another post..  :-)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cheers&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Again thanks for the great follow-up Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott (Sorry about the Ben thing.. I noticed it right after, but there is no possibility to changed that in blogger, as far as I know) :-)</p>
<p>In regards to your first question:</p>
<p>>> for the calculation of the percent all search queries are you simply taking the total count for each length and dividing by the grand total of all searches (e.g. search of 5 characters with count of 1000 divided by total of 5000 = 20% of all searches had 5 characters) and expressed as percentage?</p>
<p>Not entirely. If you have a look at the graph under section 5a; the calculation is done as a total of ALL search queries that can be accommodated in an Internal Search Query Box of a 5 character width. Therefore a calculation as this:</p>
<p>Length 1 (    13 searches) = 13 / 24000 total searches = 0.1%<br />Length 2 (    45 searches) = 45+13 / 24000 total searches = 0.2%<br />Length 3 (  251 searches) = 13+45+251 / 24000 total searches = 1.3%<br />Length 4 (  528 searches) = 13+45+251+528 / 24000 total searches = 3.5%<br />Length 5 (  866 searches) = 13+45+251+528+866 / 24000 total searches = 7.0%<br />Length 6 (3471 searches) = 13+45+251+528+866+3471 / 24000 total searches = 21.4%<br />etc..</p>
<p>(N.B. the total number of searches was 24000 something, I cannot remember the total, but it will match up)</p>
<p>In regards to the second question:</p>
<p>>>  Could a similar methodology be applied to external search keywords to determine perhaps the best keyword phrase lengths to optimize for with SEO/SEM?</p>
<p>I cannot see a correlation too that. However; one could start using “similar” attitudes towards calculation of optimal “html title length” and other high value SEO factors for organic traffic to your specific site and keywords. But that is another post..  :-)</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Again thanks for the great follow-up Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benry</title>
		<link>http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-width-of.html#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>benry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-the-width-of-your-internal-search-query-box.html#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Dennis,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Couple questions:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;- for the calculation of the percent all search queries are you simply taking the total count for each length and dividing by the grand total of all searches (e.g. search of 5 characters with count of 1000 divided by total of 5000 = 20% of all searches had 5 characters) and expressed as percentage?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;- Could a similar methodology be applied to external search keywords to determine perhaps the best keyword phrase lengths to optimize for with SEO/SEM?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;- Scott</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p>
<p>Couple questions:</p>
<p>- for the calculation of the percent all search queries are you simply taking the total count for each length and dividing by the grand total of all searches (e.g. search of 5 characters with count of 1000 divided by total of 5000 = 20% of all searches had 5 characters) and expressed as percentage?</p>
<p>- Could a similar methodology be applied to external search keywords to determine perhaps the best keyword phrase lengths to optimize for with SEO/SEM?</p>
<p>- Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis R. Mortensen</title>
		<link>http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-width-of.html#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis R. Mortensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-the-width-of-your-internal-search-query-box.html#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Two comments:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A) Thank you very much for your comment – and do let me know the result (I will be watching your blog search box now)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;B) Why have I not seen your blog before... ADDED to my Web Analytics READ List.  :-)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben,</p>
<p>Two comments:</p>
<p>A) Thank you very much for your comment – and do let me know the result (I will be watching your blog search box now)</p>
<p>B) Why have I not seen your blog before&#8230; ADDED to my Web Analytics READ List.  :-)</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benry</title>
		<link>http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-width-of.html#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>benry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://visualrevenue.com/blog/2007/05/use-web-analytics-to-determine-the-width-of-your-internal-search-query-box.html#comment-58</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a fantastic idea Dennis. Will be giving it a try this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a fantastic idea Dennis. Will be giving it a try this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

